10-6-2008

VD Evaluation

1 – Suraj Ho

Pros: Good site, original. Good drawings, strong vision.

Cons: Not moving images. Interesting Final but learn to plan how much work it takes!

Grade: 7.5

2 – Devina Cecilson

Access denied.

3 – Sebastiaan Laurentius

Pros: Good production – Good quality. Nice site. Interesting movies, especially camera mvt and editing. Go on!

Cons: Form is your strong side, don’t forget to work out the content neither. Could be deeper, or more precise.

Grade: 9

4 – Frank Neezen

Pros: Interesting and original ideas. Good tries. Interesting films. Good tries and progression.

Cons: Site could be more original. Could be more re-working on some assignments (sign for instance). Work your cinematography, but it’s ok/normal. It takes time.

Grade: 8.5

5 – Sanja Bankras

Pros: Original ideas, personal view and statement. Interesting collage idea. Great final project. Go on!

Cons: Lack of interaction within the elements of the collage.

Grade: 9

6 – Javier Quevedo

Pros: Good harmony among the whole portfolio. Interesting and original ideas. Good collage. Well finished and working game.

Cons: Game not extremely original.

Grade 8.5 – 9

7 – Laura Garrido

Pros: Good Logo. Well designed and strong outlook. Pretty pro. Well finished and working game.

Cons: Lettertype in logo put the good gfx down. Collage preview looks better than final. No integration/interaction within elements. Site a b it too ABN Amro like. Game not extremely original.

Grade: 8

8 – Sven Gude

Denied

9 – Vincent Stolte

Pros: Good profi house style.

Cons: Poor collage/storyboard. Site a not so original

Grade: 8

10 – Martin Boer

Pros: Harmonious/working collage. “Clean” works. Profi house Style site.

Cons: Storyboard a bit poor about the cinematographic pt of view.

Grade:8.5 – 9

11 – Emes Aros

Clean site. Lack a bit of statement and daring. Visually cute

Grade: 7.5 - 8

12 - Peter Litkei

Denied

13 – Stefan van de Kaa

Pros: Cleanness of site. Funny sign. A certain humor in works.

Cons: not so many work outs. A bit poor in vision.concept.

Grade: 7.5 - 8

14 – Cherry Cheng

Pros: Original website style. Subtleness in work.

Cons: Not enough production. Pity.

Grade: 7.5

15 – Edwin razab sekh

Pros: Good tries and interesting collage process. I do see an evolution within the works!

Cons: Works in general and site presentation could be a bit more mature, less schoolish. Interesting Final but learn to plan how much work it takes!

Grade: 7.5

16 – Martijn Avis

Pros: Sign and Logo are interesting and perso. Collage as well… but…

Cons: Too litteral collage. Lack of “harmony”. Poor storyboard, no cinematographic info at all. No Final.

Grade: 8

17 – Juliet Dyer

Pros: Subtle work, fine style. Good ideas. Nice collage! Good Final (Kunst Vlaai)

Cons: Could be more daring sometimes.

Grade: 8.5 – 9

18 – Yoeri Staal

Pros: Good production, lot of work in it. Innovative ideas. Good info in storyboard. Good site. Good Final (Kunst Vlaai)

Cons:

Grade: 9

19 – Twaan v.d. Loo

Pros: Good production. Good Final. (Kunst Vlaai)

Cons: A bit annoying navigation in site. Too slow. Not enough visual.

Grade: 8

20 – empty

Denied.

21- Daniel Loran

Pros: Good harmony/whole feeling within all the works. Good technical skills. Good production.

Cons: Poor storyboard. Pretty narrative (but that’s more a personal comment).

Grade: 8.5 - 9

22 – Teunis van Wijngaarden

Pros: Nice storyboard approach. Interesting site form. Some progression until story board.

Cons: final could have been more visually presented/focused.

Grade: 8.5

23 – Maarten van Meersbergen

Pros: ok technical skills and original logo/site. I see a progression in time. Good final work, especially about the transition form complex gfx to simple logo.

Cons: Lack of harmony/”whole” feeling in the first assignments.

Grade: 8.5

24 – Celestyna Banasza

Pros: Good final (Kunst Vlaai). A certain harmony in the logo.

Cons: Could have been a bit more daring in ideas, collage more like a collection.

Grade: 8

25 – Anna Mechlinska

Pros: Good and efficient simplicity in the design. Original ideas. Interesting collage. Good final (Kunst Vlaai)

Cons: Navigation in site not easy (need to go back after seeing each thing) and overall site design not so worked out.

Grade: 8.5 – 9

General comments:

When linking to a pdf, please, make it open in a new window. Easier for navigation and leave choice to the viewer.

Make sure your images can be seen fully on a “normal” computer screen. Scrolling is not nice to do and prevent the overview of the image. ó information is cropped.

For many: don’t forget that often, Less is Better!

Kunst Vlaai Project/film: I didn’t get sound with it… (?). Otherwise, it’s interesting to work in team, it has produced a long/extensive piece. Good tries and experience for later.

It’s a bit playful, narrative, could have been a bit ore focus on a specific approach, I mean a specific visual approach. Might be too many styles in one as it is now. (that can also be due to the team work… but that’s not a valid reason J).